The peculiar ways of Western Religion and Science

The Western culture since the time of Christianity, and because of its influence works in a peculiarly conceited way. Just like Christianity claimed to speak for 'god' and put words in his mouth, to suit the whims and fancies of those who controlled Christianity and the church ... its the common Western practise, including that of Western institution of science, to build pre-conceived notions and pictures of things like god and human nature, based on half-lies, what appears from the outside, and the whims and fancies of those who control that particular Western institution. And when something from the nature doesn't fit into the pre-conceived notions of that institution ... then they call it a 'sin' (religion) to be punished or prosecuted, or a 'disease' or 'abnormality' (science) to be cured. And then the persecution of that part of nature gets wide public support ... as both religion and science has immense blind faith amongst Westerners. The most funny part is that they can really get carried away with this process ... and like for science, so many commonly occurring things in nature becomes an abnormality to be adjusted or a disease to be cured, and they find pretty funny names for them too. It makes them sound all methodical and educated.

.....

How were straight males forced to define themselves as 'heterosexual'

It was not their sexual desire for women that defined the manly men, today known as straight or heterosexual males. Indeed, it was not even a universal trait for them. And it was certainly not constant nor exclusive, even where it was present. However, the men did not have a choice, when the society ruled by the anti-man forces defined them as 'men who desired women.' Indeed, the men could not speak for or defend their identity, definition and space, as they were already long silenced through centuries of politics of male gender and sexuality (conspiracy against men). They had only two options: either to leave manhood and become a 'non-man' or to acknowledge a real or exaggerated or outright fake sexual desire for women as the essence of their being. Indeed, like trained and conditioned, dogs, men just went about competing with each other trying to fit into the new definition for manhood provided by their masters, creating one of the biggest myths of this world -- that of sexual orientation being the defining features of a male; of the hetero-homo division between males, and of the hetero-masculine-'normal'-healthy-straight-majority and the homo-feminine-'different'-abnormal/anomaly-queer-minority. Indeed, the third genders fit into the 'homosexual' slot pretty well, and they keep the myth of the 'homosexual' alive and kicking.

The politics of Western manhood:

Western manhood says any kind of intimacy whether physical-social or emotional intimacy between men is essentially unmanly and 'gay.' So straight males are conditioned/ prssurised to avoid it like hell.

The politics is that they first attribute sexual intimacy between men with the group of transgenders and call the resultant phenomenon 'Homosexuality'. And then as more and more of third genders choose this 'homosexuality' they use it to politicize manhood by using the third genders as a proof that intimacy between males is indeed unmanly, feminine and 'gay'.