When societies become vulgarly rich by exploiting nature through industrialization, the anti-man vested interests that controlled the society so far, but could not annihilate men's spaces or men's sexual bonds altogether, became extremely powerful through the financial and technolgical powers gotten through industrialization, since they controlled its benefits. They also had two new extremely powerful social institutions -- science and media at their control, and they have abused them to the full.

With this unnatural power, they became 'gods' (or devils), and for the first time were able to destroy men's spaces. One's they did that, it was easy for them to isolate and banish intimacies between men into the gay ghetto.

It's by attaching power and manhood with 'sexual/ romantic/ social interest in women' that the society makes us vulnerable whether directly, indirectly, explicitly or implictly...

Unless this extremely oppressive politics is done away with any amount of freedom given to men to like men is worthless, useless... and will continue to result in the oppression of men...

Men are not only given extreme powers for proving a disinterest in men but also for upholding the mechanisms to put pressure on men, e.g. through putting the pressures on other men.

Men run after women for the same reason that they run away from men... Social manhood.

Homosexuals are part and parcel of the heterosexual ideology

The concept of 'homosexuality' and the 'homosexuals' are based upon the 'heterosexual ideology' and are an integral part of it. The heterosexual ideology believes that human male is primarily, exclusively and innately heterosexual, except for a few 'abnormalities' (these abnormalities basically refer to 'effeminate males' -- since the concept of homosexuality is based upon them -- and they today use more politically correct terms for this abnormality -- sexual minority, 'alternate', 'different', etc.).

The effeminate, third gender males believe this heterosexual ideology, that equates masculinity with liking women and femininity with liking men, because it suits their own experience of desiring men. They are O.K. with being a considered 'different', 'alternate', etc... but masculine males are not comfortable with this entire system.

Just to understand how much the homosexuals are part of the heterosexual agenda, just suggest on a gay forum that heterosexuality may not be as natural, or that men are not really geared for emotional intimacy with women and see how the homosexuals get rubbed the wrong way. And nothing threatens the gays and their identity more than the suggestion that All men may have a sexual need for men -- because, then their 'difference' is automatically null and void. You would think that a population that is supposed to represent men's sexual need for men -- even if they find it unbelievable, would at least not be agitated by this suggestion.

However, the fact is that the homosexuals DO NOT represent man's sexual need for men, nor are they Men who like men. They are queers who like men, and they will keep tainting men's sexual need for men in their own queer colour.

......

Homosexuality is Queer!!!

the essence of homosexuality is being a female inside a male (and not a man's sexual desire for men).

The homosexual male doesn't see himself as a man but a woman. And he wants to love a man like a woman, not like a man.

Therefore it hurts his sensibility to share the same identity with men. And that is why they seek a different identity from them... which the Western society provides in the form of a 'sexual identity' in order to stigmatize men's sexual feelings for men by combining them with queer's sexual feeling for men.