Sex and Gender identity

It looks like Western scholars have long said, what we have been saying here, only the Western society chose to ignore it:

One’s “sex” is determined by one’s anatomy, by one’s genitalia. On this basis
persons are declared male or female at birth.
One’s “gender identity” refers to one’s inner sense of one’s sexuality, to one’s
experience of oneself as male or female. John Money asserts:
240
Martinson
David Halperin, One Hundred Years of Homosexuality (New York: Routledge, 1990) 15.
Ibid.
Page 3
Because sex differences are not only genitally sexual, although they may be sec-
ondarily derived from the procreative organs, I found a need some thirty years
ago for a word under which to classify them. That word, which has now become
accepted into language, is gender. Everyone has a gender identity/role, one part
of which is one’s genital or genitosexual gender identity/role....the masculinity
and/orfemininityofyourgenderroleisliketheoutsideofarevolvingglobethat
everyone can observe and read the meaning of. Inside the globe are the private
workings of your gender identity.
!
It is possible to be an “anatomical” male and have a female gender identity or
vice versa, as is the case for transsexuals.
One’s “gender role” is determined by the complex interaction between one’s
sex and the culture’s determination of what is expected of or appropriate for
women or men to be and do. On this basis men and women are said to be mascu-
line or feminine. For example, it is acceptable for an anatomical female who under-
stands herself to be a woman to wear traditional men’s clothes, i.e., trousers. In the
United States such is regularly the case. It is not usually acceptable for an anatomi-
cal male who understands himself to be a man to wear traditional women’s
clothes, i.e., skirts. In the United States such a person is a cross-dresser; in Scotland
he may be in traditional garb—a kilt.

Gays will fight the idea that straight men too have a sexual need for men

IT'S SO TYPICAL that gays will reject the idea that straight men can have any sexual inclinations for men at all, because, if they accept that, their very identity will lose its ground.

And they badly need that identity, because it gives them powers at the cost of straight men. But the fact is, the entire gay-straight divide is artificial and created by the Western society.

Is same-sex need more prominent and widespread amongst women?

Same-sex sexuality is neither so strong nor universal amongst women, but the Western society and its science insists it is.
In fact, if you look at what's going on in the society, 'lesbians' seem to be more committed to each other than 'gays'. They're often into strong bonds with each other, something which is almost totally missing in gays. No one has heard of a single suicide case amongst gays.
Does it mean that the Western society is right -- that the same-sex sexuality is stronger and more Universal amongst women.
There are enough evidences from biology (wild life), history and contemporary societies to suggest that it is not so.
So, then why does it appear so. The reasons are the following:
1. The gays represent the third gender and the bonding instinct in the third gender has always been thought of as weak. They've been more into casual and promiscous sex. Innumerable ancient sacred texts talk about banning these gays or members of the third sex from their monastries etc. because of their promiscuity.
This trait is evident both in traditional societies, where men have some freedom to bond sexually and emotionally with each other, as well as in the modern West, where the gays are very strong and visible as a group. The Hijras in are another example of the promiscuity of the third gender.
However, the real man's sexual need for men exists suppressed and mutilated in the men's spaces. And history is witness (and so is wildlife) that the instinct to bond and fall in love and be committed to another man (and not just sex) is so strong amongst men that they are willing to die for each other. In modern day societies, men are oppressed and their souls no longer belong to them. Their souls are imprisioned and they are broken from their own nature. They cannot access it. Therefore, they are unable to act on their basic instinct of bonding with another man.
However, bonding between men is very masculine thing, which unfortunately has been driven out of the society.
.
2) The Western heterosexual society, however has been increasingly giving space to women's sexual need for women. E.g. by doling out dubious researches that say that same-sex sexuality is stronger amongst women. Also, same-sex acts between women have been propagated as the stable of 'heterosexual' men, thus making it mandatory for men to say they like the stuff, in fact they have to compete to prove that they like the stuff.
Therefore, when the space is created and the stuff is blown out of proportion by science, entertainment and media, women also become more open to accept or talk about those feelings. However, it is still in such minority..... in the West.
Similarly, lesbians form stronger emotional bonds with each other, because unlike male third sex, female third sex is not so promisuous. Also, they don't have pressures of masculinity which breaks men from men, emotionally, so they have no conditioning as such.

Double standards of a Heterosexual society

the double standards are clear frm the fact that the moment you prove your heterosexuality, you can be damn feminine without losing your manhood and do all those things that were unacceptable for men in traditional societies.

Fake heterosexual role models for boys

One factor in the heterosexuaisation process is the fake heterosexual role models built by the society.

.....

.....