Straight men have inherent sexual value for male body. But Straight males have only penetrative value for the female body.

Females and Gays too only have penetrative value for men's bodies (with men being the penetrators). Men's bodies don't have intrinsic value for women and homosexuals.

The name of the Game

We know that the modern western, heterosexual concept of "Sexual Orientation" is only good for isolating those men who want to openly and "blatantly" seek intimacy with other men. We also know that there never was any such concept in the world.

Societies give names to those human relationships that it wants to give importance to. E.g. the Indian society has elaborate names for a lot of blood relatives and in-laws, including separate names for maternal and paternal in-laws, maternal and paternal uncles and aunts and so on, because for the Indian society these relationships are very important and need to be recognized so that they fit into the kind of society Indian culture seeks.

Indian culture has just a broad name "dost" or friend for male friends, because the formal society doesn't want to promote or recognize such bonds. But since men's spaces have carried on their male friendships, and inspite of non-recognition by the society they continue to play an important part in men's lives, the word is still in use. Although, a male friend has no social or legal right or claim over his friend, and no social obligation or duties. Whatever there is between two male friends is just mutual, based on mutual trust.

Indian society has no name for love bonds or sexual intimacy between two masculine males (men), because it wants to portray that such intimacy is not even possible and doesn't exist at all, so that it may seem weird to men themselves to harbour such feelings (although everyone does, but they're also conditioned to feel ashamed for it!). Since, men did not have such bonds openly, they did not give even an informal name to it (although, they have given a name to sexual play between men called "masti"). However, men continued sexual and emotional intimacy with men behind the label of "friendships" which even provided them with safety against being barred socially from manhood.

But, the ancient Greek societies, and there are still such sociesties that exist in the most unlikely places -- and they're all macho, warrior societies -- placed great importance on romantic bonds between (straight) men. Therefore, they had special names for such relationships -- name for one's male lover ... since these bonds were constituted around age, there were separate names for the older and the younger lovers.

However, in none of these societies, were there names that differentiated between men who liked men and men who liked women. None of these names held a man who liked man as a different 'gender' of man, like the term 'homosexualit y' or 'homosexuality' suggests. The idea that males who like women and men are essentially and biologically different from each other form a different gender is purely a Western one, totally invalid and the most harmful part of the larger conspiracy against men.

However, even if the anti-man Forces of Heterosexualization were to implement this differentiation fairly, it would work against their very own interests. Because, then 90% of men will become homosexuals and it would sound strange to call the remaining heterosexuals as 'straight'. Because straight means 'normal', 'regular' and 'masculine'. Then Heterosexual would be the gays and be classified along with the Third Gender.

That would be the natural scheme of things.

However, the Forces of Heterosexualization are able to use this system of isolation against male-to-male intimacy only because the society has strong pscyho-sexual mechanisms and hostilities in place against man to man intimacy, which operate at the deepest level of man's existence, and which the forces of heterosexualization keep thrusting on men, perpetually.

It's due to these pressures continually applied on men that men are kept from choosing the 'homosexual' label, when this system of sexual apartheid is used, and which gives the heterosexual society and its men the present shape, which shows men as primarily, constantly and exclusively heterosexual, and the third gender minority as 'homosexual'.

Heterosexuality doesn't define manhood

It is not heterosexuality that defines manhood, but rather man's sexual desire for men that does, if we look at:

1. Natural incidence: Not all masculine males experience a sexual desire for females, and those who do it do not experience it constantly. Most males who experience a sexual desire for females experience it periodically, often only a couple of times in their entire life.

On the other, 100% of masculine gendered males in nature experience strong same-sex desires.

2. Nature of sexual desire: While the sexual desire for females amongst men is purely of a physical nature and of extremely short duration -- it doesn't lend itself naturally to an emotional or social bond of any meaningful duration and no committment -- the sexual desire for men amongst men, is naturally, more constant, strong and lends itself easily to long lasting, committed bonds.

World against straight male to male intimacy

What the modern world has destroyed is straight male to male intimacy -- from sexual to social, and what is needed is social intervention at a grand scale to restore it, keeping in mind the severity, long history and the extent of the problem.

The role of 'sexual orientation' in pressurising men to disown their need for men

When the society defines a sexual interest in men as 'queer' or 'gay', then it makes the desire an extreme burden for men -- who are in an intense race for social manhood for survival, in which they have to prove that they are not queers, however queer is defined in that society. Its a competition that gays and women are just not aware of. They only know about straights what is told or shown to them.

Isn't this burdening of man-to-man desire a clear-cut social conspiracy against men in the name of 'Sexual Freedom'?

The role of 'Sexual Orientation' and 'Homosexuality' in heterosexualizing men

By shifting the definition of 'queer' from the act of being penetrated to include even manly sexual interest in men, the concept of Sexual Orientation has severely disadvantaged man to man intimacy by placing it entirely in the hands of Queers. 

And by defining all kinds of sexual/ social/ emotional interest in women as straight or manly, it has given extreme powers to heterosexuality, deciding the fate of men as a species which is pressurised to disown their sexual need for men and to be heterosexual.

Why has the stigma shifted from getting fucked to liking men?

Why have straight men given up sex with men and disowned any sexual interest in men altogether when earlier they only avoided getting penetrated?

Why are straight men so scared of being even socially intimate with men in the West?

And the answer: Because of the invention of the concept of Sexual Orientation, homosexuality and 'gays'.

The term MSM not suitable for Straight men who desire a male lover

The term Men who have sex with men (MSM) is again extremely unsuitable for Straight men who desire men sexually. The first reason is of course, because the term is also used for Queers who have sex with men, and so the root of the problem is the same as that with the terms 'gay' or 'homosexuality'.

The second problem is that most straight men either keep off totally from receptive anal/ oral sex with men or don't acknowledge a desire for it, even if they have it -- it is because of the age old notions of these acts being 'queer'. Many genuinely don't have an interest in it. MSM on the other hand, just like 'homosexuality' is strongly linked with act of receptive anal/oral sex -- at least, it doesn't distinguish between receptive anal/ oral sex and the penetrative one, making the identity immensely stigmatized for straight men.

But the third problem, and no less important, is that most straight men, when they have sex with another man, do it in an intimate, monogamous (as far as men are concerned) and emotional bond. The term MSM signifies promiscuity of the kind prevalent in the 'gay' world. These are not men who seek sex with differet men. They are not prone to HIV/AIDS or STDS common with MSMs. So, giving them the same identity can cause a number of unwarranted stigmas to straight men who desire a male lover... which force them to hide, reject or suppress their sexual feelings for men.

Feminine sexuality for men is essentially different from masculine sexuality for men

Gay is not about any male sexuality for men... its about feminine male sexuality for men. And feminine male sexuality for men is much more different from masculine male sexuality for men than masculine male sexuality is different from masculine male sexuality for women. The primary differentiation is between masculine male sexuality and feminine male sexuality. Masculine male sexuality for men and women often exist in the same individual. You can't divide the individual. On the other hand, masculine and feminine males are essentially different people, with different sexualities, whether it is towards men or women. This principle is followed by the Western heterosexual societies for 'heterosexuals' (as signified by not allowing queer heterosexuals to be part of the straight identity)  but not for straight men who own up to like men.

Masculine male's and feminine males sexual need for men are different in every respect

Homosexuals see their desire to be 'women' (in various degrees) as an integral part of their liking men. To be fair to them, their sexuality for men is intricately linked with their feminine gender, and is indeed indistinguishable from it.

However, what gays don't realise (in traditional societies gays know that pretty well) is that masculine gendered males do not have a desire to be women, and when they like other men, they don't see themselves as women at all. Liking men does not fulfill their femininity, but enhances their manhood (at least, if it weren't for social femininity forcefully imposed on them by the heterosexualized society). for masculine gendered, or normal or regular or straight males, their sexuality for men is intricately linked with their masculinity and manhood, and is indistinguishable from the latter.

In this respect, Sexuality and Gender are not separate but intricately linked with each other, and quite indistinguishable from each other. However, not in the way that the concept of 'sexual orientation' prescribes.

Now, as we have seen, masculine gendered male's need and desire for other men (a combination of gender and sexuality) is totally different from a feminine male's sexual desire for men (again a combination of gender and sexuality). It is totally wrong to classify both of these two different sexual desires/ gender into one head as 'homosexuality' through the manipulative system of sexual orientation. Studying and stereotyping both of these using the third gender (feminine model) completely distorts nature of men's sexual need for men.

Homosexuals usurp straight male icons

After defining 'homosexuality' as love between males of all gender (including the queer, third gender males, who are not even men as per historical or traditional standards), gays have gone ahead with claiming the ancient men who love men as 'homosexuals', no matter if it was the majority of mainstream men (which can only mean straight men, since gays are only 10%)... and their love is included as history of gays and GLBT.

Nothing could be more wrong than this.

How can Alexander be a Catamite. It were the effeminate catamites who received penetrative sex from men who were the Catamites or the gay of the times. By changing the definition you can't change history or biology of people.

Third sex are not men. Men are not Third sex. That is why Queer heterosexuals are not counted as straights.

Heterosexuality belongs in the LGBT world, not man to man bonds

If anything belongs in the third gender, queer, LGBT world, its male heterosexuality, not masculine man to man bonds. These bonds are the base of manhood or straighthood.

Straight men can't take the rare opportunities to form sexual bonds with men because of their conditioning

Its not only that the society is so hostile that it doesn't allow sexual bonds between straight men that they can't happen -- the oppression against men runs so deep that it controls the depths of straight men's psyches -- that even with the best of intentions and desire, when men do get an opportunity to form a bond with another man, they are so conditioned to foresake such bonds that they lose those rare opportunities when they arise.

The real difference between Gay and Straight is 'gender' and not 'sexuality'

The definition of Gay actually consists of two parts:

One is the formal stated part and the other is the hidden unacknowledged part. Ironically, its the formal visible part of the difference that is wrong/ false/ fake. Only the unacknowledged difference is real.

The formal part is about sexuality, and it is a purely social difference with no natural or biological basis. Thus the only difference between the two males of masculine gender, one of whom is forced with the 'gay' identity and the other 'straight', is that of accepting their sexual need for men -- which is a social act... in terms of nature, both have same-sex needs.

Sexuality wise, you choose to be gay or straight. However, its the unacknoweldged difference between gay and straight which is not only a historical difference, but also a biological difference, which has been pushed behind the scenes under the Western conspiracy against men.

This unacknowledged difference is that of gender, i.e., masculine and feminine gender. This difference is not acknowledged, but this is the only difference that really works in real life (in that people actually, subconsciously take their decisions about whether they choose to be 'straight' or 'gay' based on their gender). Genderwise, you don't choose to be 'gay' or 'straight', its what you're born with.

Unless masculine male love for men is liberated from the 'gay' clutches, straight men cannot claim their own sexuality. And that is why the Western Forces of heterosxualization, under their conspiracy are hell bent on propagating same-sex needs as 'feminine' and 'unmanly'.

Straight men will only love men as much as the society gives them space

Straight men have a deep need to love other men... which they fight against all their life.

Straight men only give as much expression to their need to love men and only in such a manner that the society gives them scope within the straight space (i.e. men's space) -- especially through their politics of definitions and social classificiations. They will not cross the straight line to give expression to their same-sex needs. Their first and foremost loyalty is to their gender.

Since, in a heterosexual society there is no social space to do it in the straight space (i.e. men's space), straight men just don't acknowledge their sexual need for men at all -- but, if they get a chance they do have a relationship with another guy... only, they never talk about it or acknowledge it in anyway. Everything is done very very quietly and in a disguise, like making an excuse that girls are not present...

The power to attract another masculine male is the real power and manhood of a masculine male

Considering men have so much natural power over other men, to move them and own them completely through emotional, sexual and physical attraction -- its definitely a natural power and part of natural masculinity.

The interest in women is a weakness, although, made artificially into a source of power. This natural power has been severely curtailed and mutilated by the society and because of which it loses its natural strength.

Straight men only love men as much as the society will give them space within the straight space!

Straight men have a strong need to love other men, but they will only do as much as is the social space available for them to do it (they just won't go to the third gender gay space to do it).

And, surprisingly, they even seem to do the impossible by trying to love men in the negative space available in heterosexual societies, where straight is defined as 'heterosexual'. There they love men by pretending with their lovers that they don't have any sexual feelings even for each other, and by hiding and camouflaging their love for each other and never talking about it... but nevertheless doing a lot of those emotional things that two people intensely in love do, but doing it silently, communicating through silence -- their interest, their hurts, and all those big and small things. They don't speak out even when the relationship they so intensely want is about to break and a small word from them can save it. They'd rather just watch in silence than speak out. They just won't cross the limits set up by the society -- in this case the 'heterosexual' society.

While, all the time their heart beats for their male lover, they keep talking only about women and do all kinds of pretenses to prove their heterosexuality, even when they may or may not have any interest in women.