Wednesday, January 28, 2009
Monday, January 26, 2009
Homosexuals are part and parcel of the heterosexual ideology
The concept of 'homosexuality' and the 'homosexuals' are based upon the 'heterosexual ideology' and are an integral part of it. The heterosexual ideology believes that human male is primarily, exclusively and innately heterosexual, except for a few 'abnormalities' (these abnormalities basically refer to 'effeminate males' -- since the concept of homosexuality is based upon them -- and they today use more politically correct terms for this abnormality -- sexual minority, 'alternate', 'different', etc.).
The effeminate, third gender males believe this heterosexual ideology, that equates masculinity with liking women and femininity with liking men, because it suits their own experience of desiring men. They are O.K. with being a considered 'different', 'alternate', etc... but masculine males are not comfortable with this entire system.
Just to understand how much the homosexuals are part of the heterosexual agenda, just suggest on a gay forum that heterosexuality may not be as natural, or that men are not really geared for emotional intimacy with women and see how the homosexuals get rubbed the wrong way. And nothing threatens the gays and their identity more than the suggestion that All men may have a sexual need for men -- because, then their 'difference' is automatically null and void. You would think that a population that is supposed to represent men's sexual need for men -- even if they find it unbelievable, would at least not be agitated by this suggestion.
However, the fact is that the homosexuals DO NOT represent man's sexual need for men, nor are they Men who like men. They are queers who like men, and they will keep tainting men's sexual need for men in their own queer colour.
Monday, January 19, 2009
Homosexuality is Queer!!!
the essence of homosexuality is being a female inside a male (and not a man's sexual desire for men).
The homosexual male doesn't see himself as a man but a woman. And he wants to love a man like a woman, not like a man.
Therefore it hurts his sensibility to share the same identity with men. And that is why they seek a different identity from them... which the Western society provides in the form of a 'sexual identity' in order to stigmatize men's sexual feelings for men by combining them with queer's sexual feeling for men.
The homosexual male doesn't see himself as a man but a woman. And he wants to love a man like a woman, not like a man.
Therefore it hurts his sensibility to share the same identity with men. And that is why they seek a different identity from them... which the Western society provides in the form of a 'sexual identity' in order to stigmatize men's sexual feelings for men by combining them with queer's sexual feeling for men.
Sunday, January 18, 2009
Another problem with Sexual Orientation
Another problem with the term homosexuality and heterosexuality is that the term is used to denote various differing aspects of a man's sexuality, including, (a) Sexual desire or lust, (b) Sexual behaviour (c) love and romantic feelings (d) sexual acts (e) sexual relationships, and (e) social identity
There are elements of a man's sexual nature, of his sexual behaviour, of social interactions and his social identity in the above, all of which may actually be totally different arenas in the modern world, because of various kinds of pressures and other factors seeking to contorl male sexual life.
Denoting all of them with the same word is inviting immense scope for ambiguity and confusion.
This ambiguity and confusion is widely used by the Forces of Heterosexualization in order to muddle the facts about and true nature of male gender and sexuality.
To take an example, when you say a male is heterosexual, what does it mean. Does it mean he has exclusive sexual feelings for the opposite sex, or that he just has feeling for them (but not exclusive)? Are we referring to his social identity which may or may not reflect his exact sexual needs or even behaviour, some of which may be hidden? Are we referring to his sexual desires which may be different from his sexual behaviour or identity or relationships? Are we referring to his feelings of lust or of romantic needs, both of which may be differently oriented?
The Forces of Heterosexualization (FOH) uses this ambiguity to distort the facts to mean what they want. E.g. when they say 10% of population is homosexual, they mean they are the ones that are exclusively into men. But that is meant to mean that the rest of the population is totally heterosexual. They never say that 10% of the population is 'heterosexual' (the rest being bisexual).
However, in practise, even if a heterosexual displays the minutest of interest in intimacy with men, he is labelled a 'homo' or a 'bi' (the fear of which keeps them from showing intimacy towards other men). But he won't be counted so when talking about figures.
There are elements of a man's sexual nature, of his sexual behaviour, of social interactions and his social identity in the above, all of which may actually be totally different arenas in the modern world, because of various kinds of pressures and other factors seeking to contorl male sexual life.
Denoting all of them with the same word is inviting immense scope for ambiguity and confusion.
This ambiguity and confusion is widely used by the Forces of Heterosexualization in order to muddle the facts about and true nature of male gender and sexuality.
To take an example, when you say a male is heterosexual, what does it mean. Does it mean he has exclusive sexual feelings for the opposite sex, or that he just has feeling for them (but not exclusive)? Are we referring to his social identity which may or may not reflect his exact sexual needs or even behaviour, some of which may be hidden? Are we referring to his sexual desires which may be different from his sexual behaviour or identity or relationships? Are we referring to his feelings of lust or of romantic needs, both of which may be differently oriented?
The Forces of Heterosexualization (FOH) uses this ambiguity to distort the facts to mean what they want. E.g. when they say 10% of population is homosexual, they mean they are the ones that are exclusively into men. But that is meant to mean that the rest of the population is totally heterosexual. They never say that 10% of the population is 'heterosexual' (the rest being bisexual).
However, in practise, even if a heterosexual displays the minutest of interest in intimacy with men, he is labelled a 'homo' or a 'bi' (the fear of which keeps them from showing intimacy towards other men). But he won't be counted so when talking about figures.
Friday, January 16, 2009
Saturday, January 10, 2009
Homosexuality is a conspiracy
The 'homosexual' identity can also be seen as a clever attempt by the queer, passive males to minimize their stigma by taking an identity that ignores the difference between them and the 'normal' males who penetrated them.
As a result, their position is slightly improved in the society, but the condition of those who penetrate and man to man sexual desire as such has become extremely stigmatized, but still not quite as much as the passive, effeminate male.
As a result, their position is slightly improved in the society, but the condition of those who penetrate and man to man sexual desire as such has become extremely stigmatized, but still not quite as much as the passive, effeminate male.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)